me and my friends believe that if an outbreak happen in kansas first that it would spread faster than if the outbreak started in NewYork or any other major city. what do you think?

Views: 0

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It depends what part of KS. If it was In KC it'd be terrible,mostly because people who didn't know they were infected could go anywhere from KCI and It'd so densely populated it'd spred like wildfire
i'm saying the KC area, topeka, or even Wichita!!!! if the outbreak started in any of those cities....it would spread quicker than anyone could predict!!!
yea, but fast then New York, i doubt it. between the millions of people and modes of public transport, i believe that it would be much faster then kansas
Disease migration out of New York would be constant, but much slower.

The only direction the disease can spread is toward humanity, which means a constant progression west.

From the center of the U.S., the disease would spread much faster, in all directions, unpredictably.
With this I agree.

RSS

Now Available!

Call Us

Call the Lost Zombies hotline, toll free, and leave us a message. We may use your message in the Lost Zombies Documentary.

877-ZOMBIE0 that's
877-966-2430

LZ Merch

If you're looking for shirts and LZ gear you can check out our Zazzle store

© 2012   Created by Skot (Lost).

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service