Which one?

What type of zombie would you rather want to fight up against if an apocalypse happened. Runners or the slow walking ones?

Views: 0

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Shane on June 2, 2009 at 10:08am
runners, it makes it more fun that way
Permalink Reply by Fetters on June 10, 2009 at 1:33pm
what kind of fun?
Permalink Reply by Rylan on June 2, 2009 at 10:41am
I’d definitely prefer the slow shuffling type of zombies. The fast ghouls or infected would be so much more lethal that most of us wouldn’t survive the week.
Permalink Reply by PRIME_Ω_PREDATOR on June 2, 2009 at 7:14pm
FUN!
Permalink Reply by Courtney, zombie hunter on June 2, 2009 at 8:03pm
Slow, vegetarian zombies...but I don't think I'll have too much luck with that, so I'll just settle for slow.
Permalink Reply by PRIME_Ω_PREDATOR on June 2, 2009 at 8:19pm
Yeah, slow is good but FUN?
Permalink Reply by Courtney, zombie hunter on June 3, 2009 at 8:47am
You know what really bugs me?! The fact that when I'm playing COD 4: Nazi Zombies, they require more hits to kill as the levels get higher. WTF is that?! One bullet to the brain = one dead zombie. Period. End of story. I love the game but I hate that its just a shade away from being completely realistic.
Permalink Reply by Nicholas Von Dead on June 3, 2009 at 8:53am
To begin with, we are talking about nazi zombies so realistic per se... eh... but I get your point lol
Permalink Reply by Dale Burden on January 22, 2010 at 10:30am
Well you have to remember it is a game that is supposed to get harder as you go. Really to make it harder and keep the one shot=one kill ratio then you would have to increase the number of zomibes which would make the reload times and ammo count critical.

I think that would actually be the way to go as far as doing a "realistic" zombie game. Start out with a few and slowly add more making ammo more hard to find. Then at the higher levels ammo might be so hard to find that anything but a one shot = one kill would leave you with a real shortage.
Permalink Reply by Shane on June 3, 2009 at 7:59am
yeah its fun i mean where is the challenge in kill a zombie that just falls down all the time its like taking a drunk man break his legs and trying to shoot him
Permalink Reply by Nicholas Von Dead on June 3, 2009 at 8:56am
Well... Slow zombies are scarier (maybe 1000000 times) but runners are a lot more dangerous and (is true) fun, but Romero didn't create runners, i think (THINK) it was snyder... and well... i'm a big Romero fan so... loyalty first!!
Permalink Reply by JB on June 15, 2009 at 12:28am
NVD, you are right and possibly wrong. It depends on the volume. If it was inevitable (Death) I'd prefer runners, for pure challenge. But if my survival depended on it, the slower ones are just that slow, and I could out maneuver them much easier. But the scary part of the classic zombies is the fact that they arrive in hoards, are virtually unstoppable, and have unwavering resolve.

RSS

Now Available!

Call Us

Call the Lost Zombies hotline, toll free, and leave us a message. We may use your message in the Lost Zombies Documentary.

877-ZOMBIE0 that's
877-966-2430

LZ Merch

If you're looking for shirts and LZ gear you can check out our Zazzle store

© 2013   Created by Skot (Lost).

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!