your zombie my zombie everybodys zombie

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by The Kidd on July 11, 2008 at 9:45am

Slow zombies. Period. I know that fast zombies make it more dangerous, but the slow walkers are classic. They're still scary in more of a suspenseful way because they still manage to get ya'. Plus, they make sense because a decaying body full of rot would not be able to move quickly. The only way that the fast ones make sense is if they're not really zombies, just infected people.

Permalink Reply by juggalo rhyno on July 11, 2008 at 6:41pm

maybe there fresh zombie nd there not rotted enough yet?

as long as its workin

as long as a brothas workin lol

Permalink Reply by Jon Call on July 11, 2008 at 7:15pm

well it all depends on the film its self and what moves with the stories. like 28 days later and night of the living dead

Permalink Reply by dinoman105 on July 12, 2008 at 10:41am

Slow zombies are what I consider 'normal' zombies. The running zombies, like in the Dawn Of The Dead remake, are only scary because they can seriously move, and many, many people are self Conscious about their physical condition.

Permalink Reply by daiseywildflower on July 12, 2008 at 4:38pm

some zombies move slow some are faster.. it just depends on how long they have been dead..from what i have seen,even though they are rotting flesh,they seem to rot slower than if you were to just "die" and not have the virus..because the flesh is reanimated,the body does not rot as fast..

Permalink Reply by Hands of Death on July 14, 2008 at 5:01pm

I prefer slow zombies to be more realistic. Fast zombies make for a good adrenaline pumping zombie flick. But I hate superhuman zombies like in Day of the Dead remake. The only reason why i liked that movie a lil bit is cuz it was so horrible it was funny.

Permalink Reply by Maverick on July 14, 2008 at 10:46pm

If were talking about a story involving humans and the intense drama that would otherwise ensue do to the fast paced adrenaline ride of a zombie flick were watching then yes I prefer fast zombies. And for one simple reason, if zombies really did move that slow, then what is all the fuss about, we'd win the war in a matter of hours. The only thing that would allow a zombie horde to form and then continue unabated in a postmodern world would be there ferocious fast-paced attacks. Don't get me wrong, love Romero, love "The Night of the Living Dead" , "Zombie" & "Zombie 2" but lets face it, slow zombies are for slow people who like slow movies. Period.

Permalink Reply by Dimitri Matthews on June 17, 2010 at 11:08am

Wrong. We would not be winning the war. The Slow movers add suspense, making your gun shake, and the chance of a headshot being more difficult. Then after trying so hard, ammo runs out, you're cornered, and dead.Fast paced zombies' leg muscles' will deteriorate making them a slow zombie over time. So haha, And next time, think more logically before posting. After all, just because you want fun, and "more intense drama" doesn't mean you will get more fast zombies in the world. Most people die, and then reanimate therefore making more Shamblers than Runners in the world.

Permalink Reply by Alyssa on July 20, 2008 at 8:40pm

Slow for sure! Fast zombies aren't as scarey to me, I just think it's more suspenseful when they are slow. Also, I would pick 20 slow zombies. Cause like if they are slow I'm pretty sure you would be able to have enough time to aim and get a perfect head shot.

Permalink Reply by Drake on August 30, 2008 at 1:58pm

fast zombies in a movie and slow zombies with 25 bullets

Permalink Reply by It's Not Feez! on September 1, 2008 at 6:53pm

SLOW 2 BOTH!! Period, end of discussion.

Permalink Reply by Nick on September 5, 2008 at 12:27am

I'd take the slow zombies with 25 rounds. Then I would just walk in the opposite direction and save my ammo.


....Maybe slowly jog.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page