my research of a possibility (real)

Comment

Comment by merrick thacker on December 24, 2011 at 2:37pm

Ok then this might help if u are religous And the LORD will send a plague on all the nations that fought against Jerusalem. Their people will become like walking corpses, their flesh rotting away. Their eyes will rot in their sockets, and their tongues will rot in their mouths.
Zechariah 14:13
On that day they will be terrified, stricken by the LORD with great panic. They will fight their neighbors hand to hand.

There are several other biblical passages that allude to a plague that will decimate mankind in the end times.

Many people take the bible as the truth, and also see it as a book of prophecy. Could we have received warning of the impending rising of the undead from antiquity? We don’t have to go far to rationalize this. Prophets in ancient times may have seen exactly what happened, but didn’t understand the science behind it to describe it accurately. They may have seen the biological cause engineered in a lab and unleashed upon the world, but could only use simple words to describe it.

There are currently so many end times prophecies that it can make your head spin. Almost all of them don’t point to an exact cause of the apocalypse, but the bible seems to point to the undead several times

Revelation 11:6
These men have power to shut up the sky so that it will not rain during the time they are prophesying; and they have power to turn the waters into blood and to strike the earth with every kind of plague as often as they want.

Revelation 11:8
Their bodies will lie in the street of the great city, which is figuratively called Sodom and Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified.

Revelation 11:11
But after the three and a half days a breath of life from God entered them, and they stood on their feet, and terror struck those who saw them.

Ezekiel 37:10
So I prophesied as he commanded me, and breath entered them; they came to life and stood up on their feet–a vast army.

The bible is rife with resurrection, the dead coming to life, and stories and illiterations to the end of times. Perhaps, the plague God uses to wipe the earth clean is a plague of Zombies. You can also point to end times prophecy references of Locusts and say that zombies could also be considered as a locust, devouring all life. At this point, all we can do is speculate and prepare. We don’t know how or when the world will end, but we can be ready if it is survivable.

Comment by Jericho Syndrome on December 1, 2011 at 5:51pm

i would think so too, but then i saw Battlefield Earth and now i cant help but laugh.....

Comment by The Bruin on December 1, 2011 at 12:39pm

I doubt that if aliens were involved it was a mistake.  Europeans did the same thing to native Americans with what they considered favorable results...the tribes have never truly recovered from what was done to them.

Comment by Jericho Syndrome on December 1, 2011 at 7:19am

ignoring the 2012 crap, i can see that the only way aliens are involved is if they were actually quite stupid. 

 

'oh look, we abducted a human, lets see if our Resurrection plan that works soooo well with us will work with them *testing goes wrong* hmm it developed a severe case of the munchies, quick lets just drop him off back on his planet and hope no one will notice'

 

and Clair, believe it or not you are waiting a significantly less time than other shows with mid season breaks...

Comment by Claire on December 1, 2011 at 12:43am

Bruins gone clay pigeon shooting "PULL" BOOOOM! LMAO...   I gathered that Adma was in fact awake at silly o'clock in the morning and slurring his typing : D -  

 

Anyhoo i downloaded that episode of Ancient Aliens last night - pretty cool stuff... currently waiting what could be 1year and 2 days according to Utorrent LMAO for seasons 1,2&3 to down load... Something to watch while i wait for February to come along!  Bloody midseason finale WTF is that Walking Dead creators!!   

Comment by The Bruin on November 30, 2011 at 5:03pm

There will be no zombie apocalypse in 2012.  The Mayan Calendar, upon which the 2012 date was established, is simply the end of a cycle, not the end of the earth.  Some translations of the glyphs on the tablet upon which all of this is based indicate that one of their gods will "descend from the sky", not ascend from the ground.

I am not going to blast ancient astronaut theory, I happen to believe that this is pretty likely in fact.  What I don't believe is that we have an accurate method by which to interpret these glyphs.  We have only enough for a bit of supposition and that is all.

Thirdly, if you want to make a compelling argument, I would like to suggest that someone proof read your material before you post it.  Not only was this exceedingly difficult to follow because of several spelling mistakes, it essentially looks rushed and your conclusions are not well articulated.

As far as 2012 being "Bullshit" I disagree.  The Mayan calendar was matched up against the current and accepted calendar based on the Mayan concept of time, not on the anglicized version of time.  As an example, if one accepts that 4hrs equals one day and another group believes that 24hrs equals one day then all you are doing is creating a ration...in this case there are six cycles of one day to one cycle of another.  Then you find a mutual number, a sort of common denominator...Mayans were farmers so in this case they chose an equinox since the equinox's were commonly observed worldwide.  They then calculated the year and day based upon this common language...not by the death or birth of Christ or anything else like that.  Early civilizations have always celebrated equinox festivals, that is the common language, the numbers were then translated to the Christian Calander.

Comment by Adam on November 30, 2011 at 11:42am

just a little side note - ad as after death - means 30 or so years - the common understanding

i used that in my explination but if you use the Anno Domini Version of A.D. it takes the year disconect from 30-35 years to one year due to the lack of the year zero A.D. since after death is in the common thought it seemed logical - its also the one used in modern numerology - a further proof it is not possible.

Comment by Claire on November 30, 2011 at 5:33am

ADAMS Explanation was EPIC LoL..   awesome!

As for the ancient aliens and viruses i can live with that theory!   will be downloading the series for entertainment value if nothing else

Comment by Adam on November 30, 2011 at 1:47am

anything 2012 is complete b.s. no matter what you believe, it is beyond doubt that its b.s. for one simple reason. The mayan calander what translated in to our calander - the gregorian - which is in turn based on the julian callender.... they screwed up when they converted the julian to gregorian.... but that just means a double leap year every 4k years or so no big deal but the julian calender is the calender of ancient rome. You see the Romans did not use b.c. why would they? they calculated their date from the founding of rome. The exact year wasnt important it was only important from the date of romes founding...... so it goes back only to a guess of roughly 500 b.c.exact year eludes me at the moment but meh this is the century  they claimed rome was founded...... but thats a whole other story. If the Julian calander was roman (named after julius ceaser by the way - a way to honour him - romans did some weird stuff but thats also besides the point)  the years in B.C.  shouldnt exist... but they do .... why is that ..... Rome collapsed in A.D.  so we should have an accurate count till arround 500 b.c =/ but we dont. When rome collapsed the system of days survived in the church - but the actual year was lost - they decided in the dark ages after the collapse of rome that they needed an exact year for the birth of christ...... so they did what they did - consulted the vulgate bible (latin bible) and  figured out jesus's age at his death.....  well thats a nice starting point - since all measurements of time are arbritary - but i digress and type poorly but its 3 am so what do you expect- well back to my narrative. When they tried to figure out what year it was since his death what did they do! they counted popes lifespans and papal names.. problem is one pope changed his name...... throwing the whoooole calculation off by 5 years....... so in the most basic sense 2012 happend 5 years ago......... sorry to burst your bubble.......... but wait theres more....... there is also a period of roughly 35 years between his birth and death............ not covered in A.D ( after death) or b.c. (before christ) sooooooooooo we're also off up to 35 years on top of the 5 caused by counting the popes wrong >< so no 2012 is bullshit......... there is no chance of it being on 2012 because correcting for the errors in just the christian era  of calculations  2012 happend between 1972 and 1977!!!! so yeah. But wait theres more ....... archeological evidence says the whole 500 b.c timeframe for the foundation of rome is off too!! Rome could have been founded 200 - 400 years prior to that  so if we take that as the basis then 2012 occured between 1372 and 1572!!!! any doomsday prediction on the past based on calanders and numerology is complete b.s because we DONT HAVE THE NUMBERS for one oh oh oh oh and lets not even get into the jewish or chinese calanders because 2012 would have occured several thousand years ago!!!! =/ so no there is no chance in hell because the date has long passed =D well this rambling mess of 3 am thought is complete :) oh and just to add something the end of the mayan calander doesn't mean the end of time ........ since mayan numbers are base 20 not base 10 like ours - it means move the place holder disk up one spot and start again at 1 =/ so the whole previous argument is not needed because nobody seems to know much about history outside of europe =/ and military history.  =/

Comment by Full Choke on November 29, 2011 at 11:44pm

I have no issue with the hypothesis of ET's and zombies but I can't take The History Channel seriously especially when they are not the most consistent group when it comes to presenting actual history.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page